A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours over the construction of a wall at a coastal internet site in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has attracted nationwide focus following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children household at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental fears, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions post about René Collier as well as Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design functions at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to make their relatives property. The case has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying built by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their web page, leading to an encroachment on the Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result regions are subject matter to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their planning authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly developed, is in the correct posture. Their lawful staff has characterised the action as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-substantial water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances, an image that has because grow to be emblematic with the intensity in the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being meant to Obtain Visible proof of the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the h2o in the course of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become The most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of actions have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a place impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated intimately from the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant within the lawful timeline.
In the Main with the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as made, goes beyond what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, is described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and ailments attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to create a spouse and children house in accordance with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Special Region of Conservation and say that every one performs have already been completed according to Skilled information and authorised options. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea during a storm, will not alter the fundamental details.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute more than construction of wall at coastal web page is now a shorthand description for the condition that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous which the businessman experienced previously been linked to neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental troubles, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from extremely diverse Specialist backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining René Collier the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded through midsection-large drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily actuality with the coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal technique.
As the High Court proceedings go on, the result remains unsure. The court docket will have to ascertain whether the wall as crafted complies with scheduling permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and preparing ailments. But the human element stays central: neighbours who should Are living together with one another extended after the lawful expenditures are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, although the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns for example environmental security and property rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre in the dispute stands partially constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Whether or not it can in the end be altered, eradicated, or finished as prepared will rely upon the courtroom’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable keep on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.