A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their organizing permission by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment with a Special Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result spots are topic to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of your intensity from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as an alternative that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Accountant Paul Feely Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting the two the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to establish if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal questions. No matter if it'll in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.